Got Receipts?Public disclosure · Not a legal finding
48/100Mildly interestingPolitical Trade Notability Score· This is a signal score, not a legal finding.

Measures how unusual or noteworthy the public-record pattern appears. It is not a guilt score or investment recommendation. Politician filings and corporate insider filings are scored by two different models with different factors. Their numbers are not directly comparable.

Thomas H Tuberville

IsenateSenateJoint account

Public official's STOCK Act disclosure — not a corporate insider filing

The trade

Action

Sold

Asset

Mastercard Incorporated Common Stock

Amount disclosed

$15,001 - $50,000

Disclosed as a range — no exact value is public

Transaction date

2026-06-08

Transaction date as stated in the periodic transaction report

Disclosed

2026-07-16

Disclosure filing date (STOCK Act PTR)

Detected by Got Receipts

2026-07-16

When Got Receipts first ingested this record

Disclosure delay

Disclosed 38 days after the tradeFiled on time — This market allows 45 days to disclose. This filing took 38.

Classification

politician sale

indirect ownership

Timeline

  1. 2026-06-08

    The shares were sold

    Transaction date as stated in the periodic transaction report

  2. 2026-07-16

    The public found out

    Disclosed 38 days after the trade

  3. 2026-07-16

    Got Receipts recorded it

    When Got Receipts first ingested this record

  4. What happened after

    No specific company or policy event has been verified for this period.

Data honesty

Receipt confidence

complete

All core receipt fields are present and source-linked

Freshness

stale

Disclosed 14 days ago

Actionability

historical

The market has had ample time to absorb this disclosure

Signal strength

WATCH

Signal score 48/100. This is a signal score, not a legal finding.

  • Exact time not disclosed — date-level precision only
  • Market-calendar sessions not yet supported for this market
  • Disclosed as a range — an exact value is not public
  • Politician disclosures state ranges, not share counts or prices

Amendments: No amendment recorded; upstream amendment tracking is not yet implemented

⚠ Why this receipt was raised

A US senator for Senate sold Mastercard Incorporated Common Stock shares through a joint account. Disclosed 38 days after the trade. Filed on time. The trade is disclosed in a joint account.

In plain English

Imagine someone who helps decide the rules for a particular industry, then sells shares in a company in that same industry shortly before a major announcement. That is what a receipt looks like. The question is whether the timing is a coincidence. Often it is. Sometimes it is not. Either way, you should know about it.

✓ Could be routine because

  • · The filing met this market's disclosure deadline — 38 days against a 45-day window.
  • · No committee overlap is recorded against this filing.
  • · No repeat-trading pattern is recorded against this filing.
  • · The trade is disclosed in a joint account, so the filer may not have chosen it.
  • · The amount is disclosed as a band, not an exact figure, so the size shown is approximate.

What this doesn't prove

  • · It does not show that any non-public information was used.
  • · It does not show that anything unlawful took place. This is a public filing, not a finding.
  • · No price movement or company event has been matched to this trade, so it does not show that the timing paid off.

What can I do with this?

A receipt is a research lead, not a recommendation to buy or sell.

Source

Senate eFD PTR. Got Receipts does not allege wrongdoing. We organise public records, explain timing, and show benign explanations too.

Record ID: SENATE-f8888eccdc677f8cbab7

VIEW ORIGINAL RECEIPT ↗ — Senate eFD PTR
Public records only · Not investment advice · Not a legal finding · Just receipts, context, and a raised eyebrow.
← Back to all receipts