Measures how unusual or noteworthy the public-record pattern appears. It is not a guilt score or investment recommendation. Politician filings and corporate insider filings are scored by two different models with different factors. Their numbers are not directly comparable.
Public official's STOCK Act disclosure — not a corporate insider filing
The trade
Action
Sold
Asset
Amazon.com, Inc. - Common Stock
Amount disclosed
$100,001 - $250,000
Disclosed as a range — no exact value is public
Transaction date
2026-08-11
Transaction date as stated in the periodic transaction report
Disclosed
2026-09-09
Disclosure filing date (STOCK Act PTR)
Detected by Got Receipts
2026-09-09
When Got Receipts first ingested this record
Disclosure delay
Disclosed 29 days after the tradeFiled on time — This market allows 45 days to disclose. This filing took 29.Classification
politician sale
indirect ownership
Timeline
2026-08-11
The shares were sold
Transaction date as stated in the periodic transaction report
2026-09-09
The public found out
Disclosed 29 days after the trade
2026-09-09
Got Receipts recorded it
When Got Receipts first ingested this record
What happened after
No specific company or policy event has been verified for this period.
Data honesty
Receipt confidence
complete
All core receipt fields are present and source-linked
Freshness
recent
Disclosed 4 days ago
Actionability
limited
Disclosed within the last week
Signal strength
STRONG
Signal score 90/100. This is a signal score, not a legal finding.
Amendments: No amendment recorded; upstream amendment tracking is not yet implemented
Committee overlap
Their committee covers this sector. This does not show that they received information about this company or trade.
⚠ Why this receipt was raised
A US senator for NJ sold Amazon.com, Inc. - Common Stock shares through a spouse account. Disclosed 29 days after the trade. Filed on time. The trade is disclosed in a spouse account.
In plain English
Imagine someone who helps decide the rules for a particular industry, then sells shares in a company in that same industry shortly before a major announcement. That is what a receipt looks like. The question is whether the timing is a coincidence. Often it is. Sometimes it is not. Either way, you should know about it.
✓ Could be routine because
What this doesn't prove
What can I do with this?
A receipt is a research lead, not a recommendation to buy or sell.
Source
Senate eFD PTR. Got Receipts does not allege wrongdoing. We organise public records, explain timing, and show benign explanations too.
Record ID: SENATE-0c5482a75c44b513d36c