Got Receipts?Public disclosure · Not a legal finding
75/100Very convenient timingCorporate Insider Notability Score· This is a signal score, not a legal finding.

Measures how unusual or noteworthy the public-record pattern appears. It is not a guilt score or investment recommendation. Politician filings and corporate insider filings are scored by two different models with different factors. Their numbers are not directly comparable.

Patzwahl Nancy Koskey

IDirector · direct insider

The trade

Action

Bought

Asset

Rhinebeck Bancorp, Inc.

Amount disclosed

$298,500

Transaction date

2026-07-22

Transaction date as stated in the disclosure

Disclosed

2026-07-23

SEC filing date (Form 4)

Detected by Got Receipts

2026-07-23

When Got Receipts first ingested this record

Disclosure delay

Disclosed 1 day after the tradeFiled on time — This market allows 45 days to disclose. This filing took 1.

Classification

disclosed purchase

direct ownership

Timeline

  1. 2026-07-22

    The shares were bought

    Transaction date as stated in the disclosure

  2. 2026-07-23

    The public found out

    Disclosed 1 day after the trade

  3. 2026-07-23

    Got Receipts recorded it

    When Got Receipts first ingested this record

  4. What happened after

    No specific company or policy event has been verified for this period.

Data honesty

Receipt confidence

complete

All core receipt fields are present and source-linked

Freshness

recent

Disclosed 7 days ago

Actionability

limited

Disclosed within the last week

Signal strength

STRONG

Signal score 75/100. This is a signal score, not a legal finding.

  • Exact time not disclosed — date-level precision only
  • Market-calendar sessions not yet supported for this market

Amendments: No amendment recorded; upstream amendment tracking is not yet implemented

⚠ Why this receipt was raised

A company director bought Rhinebeck Bancorp, Inc. shares. Disclosed 1 day after the trade. Filed on time.

In plain English

Someone who runs a company bought shares in that same company with their own money and told the regulator, as required. Insiders trade legally all the time — but they also know the business from the inside, which is why the timing and size are worth a look.

✓ Could be routine because

  • · The filing met this market's disclosure deadline — 1 day against a 45-day window.
  • · Company insiders are required to disclose transactions in their own company, and this is that disclosure.
  • · No repeat-trading pattern is recorded against this filing.

What this doesn't prove

  • · It does not show that any non-public information was used.
  • · It does not show that anything unlawful took place. This is a public filing, not a finding.
  • · No price movement or company event has been matched to this trade, so it does not show that the timing paid off.

What can I do with this?

A receipt is a research lead, not a recommendation to buy or sell.

Source

SEC EDGAR (Form 4). Got Receipts does not allege wrongdoing. We organise public records, explain timing, and show benign explanations too.

Record ID: 0001437749-26-024324

VIEW ORIGINAL RECEIPT ↗ — SEC EDGAR (Form 4)
Public records only · Not investment advice · Not a legal finding · Just receipts, context, and a raised eyebrow.
← Back to all receipts